Is Corporate Governance Synonymous with Profitability? A Performance Analysis of B3 Indexes
PDF
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Brazil
corporate governance
Ibovespa
investments
governance indexes

How to Cite

Silva, D. C. da S., Santos, F. M. S., Castro, H. U. C., & Barros, M. J. F. de B. (2026). Is Corporate Governance Synonymous with Profitability? A Performance Analysis of B3 Indexes. Journal of Sustainable Institutional Management , 13(JSIM), e0158. https://doi.org/10.37497/jsim.v13.id158.2026

Abstract

Objective: To analyze and compare the financial performance of B3’s corporate governance indexes (IGC, ITAG, IGCT, and IGC-NM) in relation to the Ibovespa, to verify whether corporate governance indexes outperform the main Brazilian stock market index.

Method: An empirical study with a quantitative approach, employing a descriptive comparative method based on time series. Data from the Quantum Axis platform were used up to May 31, 2024, considering return, volatility, Sharpe and Treynor ratios, and maximum drawdown over 60-, 48-, 36-, 24-, and 12-month windows.

Results: ITAG, IGC, and IGCT outperformed Ibovespa in several time windows, while IGC-NM showed inferior performance in terms of both nominal and risk-adjusted returns. Volatility levels were similar across the indexes, but more pronounced drawdowns occurred in the governance indexes.

Originality/Relevance: The study updates the literature by considering multiple time windows up to 2024, including the pandemic period, thereby expanding the analysis of index resilience.

Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: It structures a conceptual model that connects governance theories (Agency Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Resource Dependence Theory, and Stakeholder Salience Theory) to financial metrics, providing a basis for further analyses.

Social/Managerial Contributions: It provides insights for investors, regulators, and policymakers, reinforcing the importance of corporate governance for more transparent and responsible markets.

https://doi.org/10.37497/jsim.v13.id158.2026
PDF
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press.

Arruda, G. S., Madruga, S. R., & Freitas Junior, N. I. (2008). A governança corporativa e a teoria da agência em consonância com a controladoria. Revista de Administração da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 1(1), 71-84.

Azevedo, S. (2000). Administrar para todos os acionistas é o grande desafio. Clipping do IBGC, (1).

B3. (n.d.-a). Índice Bovespa (Ibovespa). B3. https://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/market-data-e-indices/indices/indices-amplos/ibovespa.htm

B3. (n.d.-b). Índices de governança. B3. https://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/market-data-e-indices/indices/indices-de-governanca/

B3. (n.d.-c). Manual de definições e procedimentos dos índices. B3. https://www.b3.com.br/data/files/CA/A5/9F/28/14F35810F534EB48AC094EA8/Manual%20de%20defini%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20e%20procedimentos%20de%20%C3%8Dndices-PT.pdf

Bauer, R., Frijns, B., Otten, R., & Tourani-Rad, A. (2008). The impact of corporate governance on corporate performance: Evidence from Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 16(3), 236-251.

Bebchuk, L. A., & Tallarita, R. (2020). The illusory promise of stakeholder governance. Cornell L. Rev., 106, 91.

Bhagat, S., Bolton, B., & Romano, R. (2008). The promise and peril of corporate governance indices. Colum. L. Rev., 108, 1803.

Boyer, M. (2021). Beyond ESG: reforming capitalism and social democracy. Annals of Corporate Governance, 6(2–3), 90-226.

Lei n.º 6.385, de 7 de dezembro de 1976. (1976). Dispõe sobre o mercado de valores mobiliários e cria a Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM). Diário Oficial da União. Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6385compilada.htm

Lei n.º 6.404, de 15 de dezembro de 1976. (1976). Dispõe sobre as sociedades por ações. Diário Oficial da União. Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6404compilada.htm

Bronstein, M. M. (2020). Levantamento Bibliométrico: Governança Corporativa, Teoria da Agência e Teoria dos Stakeholders no Campo da Administração. Revista Cadernos de Negócios, 1(1).

Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Gee and Co.

Carlsson, R. H. (2001). Ownership and value creation: Strategic corporate governance in the new economy. John Wiley.

Carvalho, A. G. D. (2002). Governança corporativa no Brasil em perspectiva. Revista de Administração-RAUSP, 37(3), 19-32.

Castro, H. U. (2013). Fatores que contribuem para o desenvolvimento da governança tributária: um estudo de caso sobre a estruturação da administração tributária da Petrobras.

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.

Cornell, B., & Damodaran, A. (2020). Valuing ESG: Doing good or sounding good? NYU Stern School of Business.

Cotter, R., Dason, J., Niu, J., & Klein, P. (2011). Corporate governance and stock performance: Evidence from Canadian firms over the period 2005-2009. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8(3 A), 56-62.

Cunha, F. A. F. de S., & Samanez, C. P. (2013). Performance analysis of sustainable investments in the Brazilian stock market: A study about the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE). Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 19-36.

Comissão de Valores Mobiliários. (1999). Instrução CVM nº 308, de 14 de maio de 1999. Dispõe sobre o registro e o exercício da atividade de auditoria independente. https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/legislacao/instrucoes/inst308.html

Denning, S. (2020). Why stakeholder capitalism will fail? Forbes. Available on the Web.

Ewing, J. (2017). Faster, Higher, Farther: How One of the World's Largest Automakers Committed a Massive and Stunning Fraud. WW Norton & Company.

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983a). Agency problems and residual claims. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983b). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.

Gil, A. C. (2008). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. Editora Atlas SA.

Hatch, M. J. (2018). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford University Press.

Hindasah, L., & Akmalia, A. (2023). Can Corporate Governance Protect Firm Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Calitatea, 24(192), 174-182.

Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa. (2023). Código de melhores práticas de governança corporativa (6ª ed.). IBGC. https://conhecimento.ibgc.org.br/Paginas/Publicacao.aspx?PubId=24640

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate Governance (pp. 77-132). Gower.

Jo, H., Hsu, A., Llanos-Popolizio, R., & Vergara-Vega, J. (2021). Corporate governance and financial fraud of wirecard. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 96-106.

Kirkpatrick, G. (2009). The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis. OECD Journal: Financial market trends, 2009(1), 61-87.

Leal, R. P., Carvalhal, A., & Iervolino, A. (2015). One decade of evolution of corporate governance practices in Brazil. Available at SSRN 2611372.

Malkiel, B. G. (2021). A random walk down Wall Street: The time-tested strategy for successful investing. W. W. Norton & Company.

Marques, L., & Marques, L. (2020). The illusion of a sustainable capitalism. Capitalism and Environmental Collapse, 333-362.

Means, G. (2017). The modern corporation and private property. Routledge.

Mengarda, K., de Amorim, A. P. A. S., de Oliveira, E. S., Gasperini, F., & de Almeida, R. S. D. S. (2024). Governança Corporativa e a Teoria da Agência: Levantamento Bibliométrico. Revista Controladoria e Gestão, 5(1), 1068-1083.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (2011). Corporate Governance. John Wiley & Sons.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). The OECD principles of corporate governance. Contaduría y Administración, (216).

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2015). External control of organizations—Resource dependence perspective. In Organizational behavior 2 (pp. 355-370). Routledge.

Ribeiro, J. E., & Souza, A. A. D. (2023). Corporate governance index and market performance: evidence in the Brazilian stock market. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 34(92), e1756.

Shah, N., Napier, C. J., & Holloway, R. (2017). The Cadbury Report 1992: Shared vision and beyond. United Kingdom, available at: https://scholar. google. co. uk/citations.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783.

Silva, L. L., & Milani, B. (2021). Governança Corporativa: Uma análise dos retornos dos índices da B3. Administração de Empresas em Revista, 4(26), 272-295.

United Nations Global Compact. (2004). Who cares wins: Connecting financial markets to a changing world.

Vilanova, M. E. M., Bazanini, R., Ryngelblum, A. L., & Margueiro, E. A. (2024). Reflexões sobre as controvérsias do modelo stakeholders capitalism como fator de criação de valor na cadeia da carne bovina brasileira: relevante ou inoperante? Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, 13(1),

e23761-e23761.

Weber, J. (2011). The development of controller tasks: explaining the nature of controllership and its changes. Journal of Management Control, 22, 25-46.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;

2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;

3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);

4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.

5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.

6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.