Investigation of the Scientific Production of the Term “Carbon” In Brazilian Academia from the Perspective of Social Network Analysis
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Carbon
Scientific Production
Social Network Analysis
Spell Database
Sustainability

How to Cite

Melo Ribeiro, H. C. (2026). Investigation of the Scientific Production of the Term “Carbon” In Brazilian Academia from the Perspective of Social Network Analysis. Journal of Sustainable Institutional Management , 13(JSIM), e0188. https://doi.org/10.37497/jsim.v13.id188.2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the profile and evolution of scientific production related to the term “carbon” in Brazilian academia, focusing on collaboration structures and thematic trends through a social network analysis approach.

Method: The research adopts a bibliometric and sociometric design based on articles indexed in the SPELL database. Social network analysis techniques were applied to examine co-authorship patterns, network structures, journal distribution, and keyword co-occurrence, enabling the identification of structural and thematic dynamics in the field.

Findings: The results indicate a gradual growth in scientific production on carbon-related topics, marked by increasingly interconnected collaboration networks and thematic diversification. The most recurrent themes were associated with sustainability, climate change, carbon credits, greenhouse gases, environmental disclosure, and renewable energy. The field presents a multidisciplinary orientation and reflects a growing alignment with environmental, economic, and regulatory challenges.

 Originality/Relevance: This study contributes to the literature by integrating social network analysis with the examination of carbon-related scientific production indexed in SPELL, offering a broader understanding of the structural configuration and thematic development of this research field in Brazil.

Conclusions: The findings expand the understanding of how knowledge on carbon has been organized and disseminated in Brazilian academic production, while also offering support for future investigations using bibliometric, sociometric, and systematic review approaches.

https://doi.org/10.37497/jsim.v13.id188.2026
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Asadnabizadeh, M., & Moe, E. (2024). A review of Global Carbon Markets from Kyoto to Paris and beyond: the persistent failure of implementation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1368105

Basso, R. L., Bertagnolli, D. D. de O., & Santos, L. A. dos. (2018). Análise bibliométrica da produção científica em contabilidade ligada aos créditos de carbono. Revista Capital Científico – Eletrônica, 16(1), 46-64. https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-4153.20180004

Bhaktikul, K., Aroonsrimorakot, S., Laiphrakpam, M., & Paisantanakij, W. (2021). Toward a low‑carbon tourism for sustainable development: a study based on a royal project for highland community development in Chiang Rai, Thailand. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 10743-10762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01083-4

Chen, Q., Zhang, H., Lau, Y-Y., Wang, T., Wang, W., & Zhang, G. (2023). Climate change, carbon peaks, and carbon neutralization: a bibliometric study from 2006 to 2023. Sustainability, 15(5723), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075723

Colombo, S. G., Oliveira, A. K. M. de, Bortoluzzi, M. B. de O., Reis Neto, J. F. dos, Facco, G. G., Matias, R., & Santos, A. L. B. dos. (2024). Pecuária de leite sustentável e o nexo entre eficiência técnica, econômica e ambiental: uma análise bibliométrica. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 63, 87-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/dma.v63i0.87553

Dias, F. de O., Bonfim, H. dos S., Bombardelli, J., & Matos, G. B. da C. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on carbon credits (2012-2021). Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 17(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n1-026

Facin, A. L. F., Barbosa, A. P. F. P. L., Matsumoto, C., Cruz, A. F. S. da G., & Salerno, M. S. (2022). Temas de destaque na pesquisa em transformação digital: evidências de estudo bibliométrico e análise de conteúdo. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 62(6), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020220602

Favaretto, J. E. R., & Francisco, E. de R. (2017). Exploração do acervo da RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas (de 1961 a 2016) à luz da bibliometria, text mining, rede social e geoanálise. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(4), 365-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020170407

Ferreira, J. B., & Silva, L. de A. M. (2019). O uso da bibliometria e sociometria como diferencial em pesquisas de revisão. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação, 15(2), 448-464.

Freitas, A. R. P. de, & Paiva, L. E. B. (2018). Revisão da produção científica internacional de brasileiros acerca das mudanças climáticas. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 12(3), 95-113.

Góes, M. de F. B., Andrade, J. C. S., Silva, M. S., Santana, A. C. (2018). Projetos de MDL de energia eólica no nordeste do Brasil: perfil e cobenefícios declarados. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 12(2), 71-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v12i2.1477

Grácio, M. C. C. (2018). Colaboração científica: indicadores relacionais de coautoria. Brazilian Journal of Information Studies: Research Trends. 12(2), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2018.v12n2.04.p24

He, R., Luo, L., Shamsuddin, A., & Tang, Q. (2021). Corporate carbon accounting: a literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement. Accounting & Finance, 62(1), 261-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12789

Huang, G., Xu, Z., Qu, X., Cao, J., Long, S., Yang, K., Hou, H., Wang, Y., & Ma, X. (2022). Critical climate issues toward carbon neutrality targets. Fundamental Research, 2(3), 396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2022.02.011

IBEPES. (2024). SPELL - Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library. Revista Áudio e Base de dados, 1, ID25. Recuperado de: <https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/pas/index.php/jad/article/view/301>

Kreibich, N., & Hermwille, L. (2021). Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020. Climate Policy, 21(7), 939-957. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384

Kurniawan, K., Subowo, H., & Firmansyah, I. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of carbon accounting research. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(3), 482-489. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.12992

Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2021). Journals publishing social network analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 3593-3620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03889-z

Melo, R. S., Braga, S. de S., & Lins, R. P. M. (2021). Contribuição dos meios de hospedagem para as emissões diretas de dióxido de carbono (CO2) na cidade de Parnaíba (Piauí, Brasil). Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, 15(2), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.7784/rbtur.v15i2.1968

Nurramadhani, A., Riandi, R., Permanasari, A., & Suwarma, I. R. (2024). Low-carbon food consumption for solving climate change mitigation: literature review with bibliometric and simple calculation application for cultivating sustainability consciousness in facing sustainable development goals (SDGs). Indonesian Journal of Science & Technology, 9(2), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v9i1.67302

Oliveira, T. D., Santos, T. C. dos, Weiler, J., Aguiar, A. de O. e, Fernandes, C. C., & Ziglio, L. (2024). The contribution of the University of São Paulo to the scientific production on climate change: a bibliometric analysis. Discover Sustainability, 5(148), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00301-7

Oliveira, Y. P. L. de. (2022). Desafios do mercado de carbono após o acordo de Paris: uma revisão. Meio Ambiente, 4(1), 2-20.

Pereira, A. N., Lamenza, A., Faria, A. C. de, & Pereira, R. S. (2014). Rede de pesquisadores de créditos de carbono no brasil entre 2006 e 2012: um estudo bibliométrico e sociométrico. Revista de Administração, Contabilidade e Sustentabilidade, 4(3), 1-19.

Rafael, S. L. L. (2023). SPELL: ten years of contribution to science. Recuperado de: <https://anpad.org.br/en/newsletter-news/january-march-2023-edition-volume-3-issue-1/news/spell-ten-years-of-contribution-to-science/>

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2022). 20 anos do escândalo corporativo da Enron: uma análise de sua produção científica à luz da análise de redes sociais. ConTexto, 22(52), 45-59.

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2025a). Análise da produção científica brasileira dos estudos que usaram o SPELL como banco de dados para a busca da pesquisa científica. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento, 15(3), 104-124. https://dx.doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2236-417X.2025v15n3.73286

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2024a). Bibliometria e sociometria: panorama e tendência no Brasil. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento, 14(2), 135-164. https://dx.doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2236-417X.2024v14n2.69341

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2024b). Bitcoin: behavior, profile, and trends of scientific production in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation, 12(2), 1-60. https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.26211

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2025c). Clean development mechanism: Profile and behavior in brazilian academia from the perspective of social network analysis. Contemporary Journal of Economics and Management, 23(e94488), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.36517/contextus.2025.94488

Ribeiro, H. C. M., Corrêa, R., Pierot, R. M., & Leal, L. G. do N. (2024). 20 years of the Kyoto Protocol: profile and behavior in brazilian academia from the perspective of social network analysis. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(11), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n11-190

Ribeiro, H. C. M., Costa, B. K., Ferreira, M. A. S. P. V., & Serra, B. P. de C. (2014). Produção científica sobre os temas governança corporativa e stakeholders em periódicos internacionais. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 17(1), 95-114.

Ribeiro, H. C. (2025). First Publications on Chatgpt in Brazilian Academia from the Perspective of Social Network Analysis. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6, e046. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v6ii.46

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence: Profile and Behavior in the Brazilian Academy. SDGs Studies Review , 6(studies), e045. https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v6istudies.45

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2025b). Dam failure: behavior and trends in brazilian academia from the perspective of the Mariana and Brumadinho cases. Journal of Sustainable Institutional Management, 12(e0180), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.37497/jsim.v12.id180.2025

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2025d). Environmental, social and governance: comportamento e perfil na academia brasileira. Desafio Online, 13(1), 64-88. https://doi.org/10.55028/don.v13i1.20247

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2020). Estado da produção científica divulgada no congresso UnB de contabilidade e governança: análise bibliométrica e sociométrica. Revista de Administração, Contabilidade e Economia da Fundace, 11(2), 66-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.13059/racef.v11i2.671

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2021). Estratégia em destaque: duas décadas de produção científica do evento 3Es à luz da análise de redes sociais. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 26(4), 113-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/25199

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2023a). Governança corporativa: uma análise da produção científica divulgada nos periódicos científicos nacionais indexados na SPELL. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 17(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v17i2.58410

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2026). Insider trading: comportamento, perfil e tendência na academia do Brasil. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 18(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2026.v18i1.940

Ribeiro, H. C. M. (2023b). Produção científica dos estudos que utilizaram o método da revisão sistemática da literatura publicados pelos periódicos científicos indexados no SPELL. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento, 13(2), 149-177. https://dx.doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2236-417X.2023v13n2.65373

Ribeiro, H. C. M., & Souza, M. T. S. de. (2022). Economia circular e turismo: produção científica à luz da análise de redes sociais. Estudios Gerenciales, 38(164), 385-402. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2022.164.5086

Ridelensky, J. do C. F., & Santos, A. R. dos. (2022). Projetos de mecanismo de desenvolvimento limpo – MDL uma coletânea de projetos aprovados no Brasil na última década. Research, Society and Development, 11(4), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27087

Rocha Júnior, P. R. de S., Rosa, A. A., Santos, W. F. R., Silva, D. P., & Moreira, I. de S. (2024). Reconstruindo a abordagem do mercado de crédito de carbono sob a perspectiva construtivista. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 15(5), 1-24. http://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v15i5.3760

Rohrich, S. S., & Takahashi, A. R. W. (2019). Sustentabilidade ambiental em Instituições de Ensino Superior, um estudo bibliométrico sobre as publicações nacionais. Gestão & Produção, 26(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X2861-19

Rosa, R. A., & Romani-Dias, M. (2019). A presença e o impacto de periódicos brasileiros da área de administração, contabilidade e turismo em bases científicas. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa, 18(3), 327-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2019014

Sampaio, R. B., Sacerdote, H. C. de S., Fonseca, B. de P. F., & Fernandes, J. H. C. (2015). A colaboração científica na pesquisa sobre coautoria: um método baseado na análise de redes. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 20(4), 79-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/2447

Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (SPELL). Home. Recuperado de: < http://www.spell.org.br/>

Seyedabadi, M. R., Karrabi, M., & Nabati, J. (2021). Investigating green roofs’ CO2 sequestration with coldand drought-tolerant plants (a short- and long-term carbon footprint view). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16750-w

Tomaél, M. I., & Marteleto, R. M. (2013). Redes sociais de dois modos: aspectos conceituais. TransInformação, 25(3), 245-253.

Urbizagástegui-Alvarado, R. (2022). Bibliometria brasileira: análise de copalavras. TransInformação, 34, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202234e220004

Wang, Y., Guo, C-h., Chen, X-j., Jia, L-q., Guo, X-n., Chen, R-s., Zhang, M-s., Chen, Z-y., & Wang, H-d. (2021). Carbon peak and carbon neutrality in China: Goals, implementation path and prospects. China Geology, 4(4), 720-746. https://doi.org/10.31035/cg2021083

Wei, J., Zhao, K., Zhang, L., Yang, R., & Wang, M. (2021). Exploring development and evolutionary trends in carbon offset research: a bibliometric perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 18850-18869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12908-8

Williams Dos Santos, C., & Farias Filho, M. C. (2016). Agentes comunitários de saúde: uma perspectiva do capital social. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 21(5), 1659-1667. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015215.23332015

Zheng, Y., Li, Z., & Chai, J. (2023). Progress and prospects of international carbon peaking and carbon neutral research-based on bibliometric analysis (1991–2022). Frontiers in Energy Research, 11, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1121639

Zhou, C., Zhang, R., Loginova, J., Sharma, V., Zhang, Z., & Qian, Z. (2022). Institutional logic of carbon neutrality policies in China: what can we learn? Energies, 15(4391), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124391

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;

2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;

3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);

4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.

5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.

6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.